91
Colloidal Silver Production / Re: maltrodextrin powder
« Last post by Gene on March 20, 2024, 05:53:43 AM »The higher the DE number the better a stabilizer the malto is BUT the worse it gets as a reducer. Reason being, a DE of 12 is 12 glucose molecules with the head end of one hanging onto the tail end of the next, rinse and repeat where only one "head" at one end of that long chain can reduce ONE silver oxide particle to Colloidal Silver. The higher the DE number the more malto you need to reduce a given weight of silver oxide dissolved in water.
The good side of a higher DE number is that the DE becomes a much better stabilizer for non-gelcapped Colloidal Silver production because the DE chains are longer where after reduction, the spent malto reducer crowds the silver particles and coats them, thereby stabilizing them where the more "stuff" they're coated with, the better they're stabilized. Makes sense, right? If you dip something in really thin paint, after its dry its easy to scratch it. If you dip it in much thicker paint, after its dry its that much harder to scratch it as an analogy.
I have a friend in Austria (Vienna) who makes Colloidal Silver. I believe he bought some DE though I don't recall which DE number he chose.
If I had to choose, I'd probably go middle of the road. 12 should work as a good stabilizer also. Remember, the higher the DE number the more malto you need to do the same reduction than a lower DE number malto requires. Its all a balancing act.
IIRC, the individual that came up with the formula to compute how much malto you need figured it out based on a worst case - all highest DE number malto so if you get DE 12 and use that formula you will have an excess of malto in solution which will work out to your advantage to speed up reduction and also provide even more stabilization when thats necessary (non-gelcapped Colloidal Silver).
The good side of a higher DE number is that the DE becomes a much better stabilizer for non-gelcapped Colloidal Silver production because the DE chains are longer where after reduction, the spent malto reducer crowds the silver particles and coats them, thereby stabilizing them where the more "stuff" they're coated with, the better they're stabilized. Makes sense, right? If you dip something in really thin paint, after its dry its easy to scratch it. If you dip it in much thicker paint, after its dry its that much harder to scratch it as an analogy.
I have a friend in Austria (Vienna) who makes Colloidal Silver. I believe he bought some DE though I don't recall which DE number he chose.
If I had to choose, I'd probably go middle of the road. 12 should work as a good stabilizer also. Remember, the higher the DE number the more malto you need to do the same reduction than a lower DE number malto requires. Its all a balancing act.
IIRC, the individual that came up with the formula to compute how much malto you need figured it out based on a worst case - all highest DE number malto so if you get DE 12 and use that formula you will have an excess of malto in solution which will work out to your advantage to speed up reduction and also provide even more stabilization when thats necessary (non-gelcapped Colloidal Silver).